The Longest Happy String interview question asks you to construct the longest possible string using only the characters 'a', 'b', and 'c'. You are given the maximum number of times each character can be used (integers a, b, and c). However, there is a catch: the resulting string cannot contain three consecutive identical characters (e.g., "aaa" is illegal). Your goal is to return a string that follows these rules and is as long as possible.
This is a prominent problem asked by companies like Microsoft and Amazon because it is a pure test of Greedy algorithms and Priority Queues (Heaps). It challenges candidates to think logically about resource depletion and constraints. The interviewer wants to see if you can build a system that prioritizes using the most abundant character while actively avoiding the "three-in-a-row" penalty.
This problem perfectly aligns with the Greedy Strategy implemented via a Max Heap (Priority Queue). At any given step, your greedy choice should be to append the character with the highest remaining count to your string. However, if appending that character would create a forbidden sequence (three identical characters in a row), you must instead append the character with the second highest count, effectively breaking the chain, and then put both characters back into the heap for future consideration.
Suppose a = 1, b = 1, c = 7.
We put them in a max heap based on counts: [ (7, 'c'), (1, 'b'), (1, 'a') ].
(7, 'c'). Append two 'c's (to maximize usage without breaking the rule). String is "cc". 'c' count is now 5."ccc". So we pop the next most frequent: (1, 'b'). Append one 'b'. String is "ccb". 'b' count is 0.[ (5, 'c'), (1, 'a') ]."ccbcc". 'c' count is 3."ccbcca". 'a' count is 0.[ (3, 'c') ]."ccbccacc". 'c' count is 1."ccbccacc" is the longest happy string.A common error is overcomplicating the greedy choice by trying to look too far ahead, leading to tangled recursion. Another frequent mistake is forgetting to check the last two characters of the dynamically built string before appending a new character. Candidates sometimes just pop from the heap and append blindly, accidentally creating the illegal "aaa" pattern.
When tackling the Longest Happy String coding problem, get comfortable writing custom comparators for Priority Queues. Remember the core loop logic for this pattern: Pop the max element. If it causes a violation, temporarily hold it, pop the second max element, use it once to break the violation, and then push the first element back into the heap. This "hold and swap" technique is crucial for greedy constraint problems.
| Title | Difficulty | Topics | LeetCode |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Password Checker | Hard | Solve | |
| String Without AAA or BBB | Medium | Solve | |
| Minimum Suffix Flips | Medium | Solve | |
| Maximum Value after Insertion | Medium | Solve | |
| Minimum Number of Swaps to Make the Binary String Alternating | Medium | Solve |