Magicsheet logo

Minimum Difference in Sums After Removal of Elements

Hard
37.5%
Updated 8/1/2025

Minimum Difference in Sums After Removal of Elements

1. What is this problem about?

The Minimum Difference in Sums After Removal of Elements problem is a complex partitioning challenge. You are given an array of size 3N3N. You must remove exactly NN elements such that the remaining 2N2N elements can be split into two equal parts (first NN and second NN). The goal is to minimize the sum of the first part minus the sum of the second part. To do this, you want the first part to be as small as possible and the second part to be as large as possible.

2. Why is this asked in interviews?

This "Hard" question is asked by Microsoft and Google to test a candidate's ability to use advanced data structures like Heaps to maintain running sums. The Minimum Difference in Sums After Removal of Elements interview question evaluates whether you can use prefix and suffix arrays to precalculate optimal values for every possible split point, which is a key technique for large-scale optimization.

3. Algorithmic pattern used

The algorithmic pattern is a combination of Heaps and Prefix/Suffix optimization.

  1. First Part (Smallest Sum): Use a Max-Heap to keep the NN smallest elements encountered from the left. As you iterate from i=Ni=N to 2N2N, if the current element is smaller than the heap top, swap them. Store the running sum in a prefixSum array.
  2. Second Part (Largest Sum): Use a Min-Heap to keep the NN largest elements from the right. Iterate from i=2N1i=2N-1 down to N1N-1. Store the running sum in a suffixSum array.
  3. Minimize: The answer is min(prefixSum[i]suffixSum[i+1])\min(prefixSum[i] - suffixSum[i+1]) for all valid split points ii. This "Array, Heap, Priority Queue interview pattern" is the most efficient way to solve this problem in O(NlogN)O(N \log N).

4. Example explanation

Array of size 6 (N=2N=2): [3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 2].

  • Left side optimal sums for N=2N=2:
    • Start with [3, 1], sum = 4.
    • Next element is 2. 2 < 3 (heap top), so replace 3. Sum = 1 + 2 = 3.
  • Right side optimal sums for N=2N=2:
    • Start with [4, 2], sum = 6.
    • Next element is 1. 1 is not > 2, keep [4, 2]. Sum = 6.
  • Split after index 2: Left sum 3, Right sum 6. Difference = 36=33 - 6 = -3.

5. Common mistakes candidates make

In the Minimum Difference in Sums After Removal of Elements coding problem, a common error is using the wrong heap type (e.g., Min-Heap for the left side when you actually need to remove the largest elements to keep the smallest ones). Another mistake is not precalculating the suffix sums, which leads to an O(N2)O(N^2) solution that will time out. Candidates also often forget that the split point ii must leave enough elements on both sides to form a group of size NN.

6. Interview preparation tip

When you need to find an optimal split point in an array, think about precalculating "best so far from left" and "best so far from right." This "Prefix/Suffix optimization interview pattern" is a versatile tool that appears in many hard problems involving subarrays, partitions, and sequence optimization.

Similar Questions