Minimum Difficulty of a Job Schedule is a classic partitioning problem. You are given an array of jobs, where each job has a difficulty level, and a number of days d. You must schedule all jobs over exactly d days. The rules are:
This "Hard" problem is a favorite at Amazon, Apple, and Salesforce. The Minimum Difficulty of a Job Schedule interview question is a perfect test of Multi-stage Dynamic Programming. It assesses your ability to define a state that captures both the progress through the jobs and the number of days used. It also tests optimization, as the naive DP can be improved using a monotonic stack.
The algorithmic pattern is Dynamic Programming. Let be the minimum difficulty to complete the first jobs in days. To compute , we consider all possible split points for the last day: . This "Array, Dynamic Programming interview pattern" typically runs in . With , this approach is well within the time limits.
Jobs: [6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1], .
The most frequent error in the Minimum Difficulty of a Job Schedule coding problem is not handling the base cases correctly (e.g., when number of jobs < ). Another mistake is failing to correctly find the maximum difficulty within a subarray efficiently, often recalculating it unnecessarily. Some candidates also struggle with the order of loops in their DP, leading to results that use the same day's data twice.
Whenever you need to partition an array into segments, think of . This "Partitioning DP interview pattern" is a core skill. Practice identifying when the cost of a segment is a "max" or "sum," as this dictates how you optimize the transition. For "max" segments, look into using a monotonic stack for optimization.