The Maximum Price to Fill a Bag interview question is a variation of the classic Fractional Knapsack problem. You are given a set of items, each with a price and a weight, and a bag with a maximum weight capacity. You want to fill the bag such that the total price of the items is maximized. Unlike the 0/1 Knapsack problem, you can take fractions of an item if needed.
The goal is to determine the highest possible value you can carry given the weight constraint. This problem tests your ability to make locally optimal choices to reach a global optimum.
This Maximum Price to Fill a Bag coding problem is a staple at companies like Microsoft because it evaluates a candidate's understanding of greedy strategies. It's a fundamental problem that distinguishes between those who understand optimization and those who might default to more complex but unnecessary algorithms like Dynamic Programming. It also tests your ability to implement custom sorting logic, which is a key skill in day-to-day software engineering.
The Array, Sorting, Greedy interview pattern is the correct approach for this problem. The greedy choice here is to always pick the item with the highest "price-per-unit-weight" ratio.
Bag capacity: 10kg. Items:
Sorted by Ratio: C(4), A(3), B(2).
If the capacity was 40kg:
A frequent mistake in the Maximum Price to Fill a Bag coding problem is trying to use 0/1 Knapsack logic (Dynamic Programming). This is overkill and incorrect for the fractional version. Another error is sorting only by price or only by weight; neither guarantees the maximum value. Candidates also sometimes struggle with precision issues when dealing with floating-point ratios and fractions, so it's important to use appropriate data types.
When you see a problem that allows for "fractions" or "proportions" and asks for a maximum/minimum, your first thought should be a Greedy algorithm. Practice writing custom comparators for sorting, as this is the most common way to implement the greedy choice in these types of problems.